To Access this file via Dropbox (downloadable to PC, Mac, iPhone, iPad, and Android), use this link:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/65388278/Dracula%20Extra%20Credit%20Project.docx
Dracula Extra Credit Project (10 points possible)
Last Day Work will be accepted: ___________________________________________________
- You have many different projects that are competing for your attention. You will have to manage your time, so this project has a rolling due date. That is, you may hand in your project at ANY TIME from now until the last day that work will be accepted. When you are finished and ready to hand in your project, email socialstudiesdavis@gmail.com to arrange a pickup/presentation time.
- As this is an Extra Credit Project, you do not have to complete the assignment. In addition, it is possible to earn up to 10 points but that does not mean that you will receive all of the points. You cannot earn over 10 points, so do not try to do all of the projects.
Choose ONE project below to turn in. Multiple projects will not be accepted.
Plan to Do |
Project |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assignment Details
Rewritten Scene from Dracula
|
Dracula NYC
|
Scrapbook for Dracula
|
You Be the Person
|
Name: ____________________________________________________________
Rubric for Dracula NYC/Scrapbook/Rewritten scene
Criteria |
Excellent |
Good |
Poor |
Total |
Content:
Is the content of the product well chosen? |
Content chosen represents the best choice for the product. Graphics are well chosen and related to content. |
Information or graphics are related to content, but are not the best choice for the product. |
Information or graphics presented do not appear to be related to topic or task. |
|
Completeness:
Is everything included in the product? |
All information needed is included. Product meets the product criteria and the criteria of the task as stated. |
Some important information is missing. Product meets the product criteria and the criteria of the task as stated. |
Most important information is missing. The product does not meet the task or does not meet the product criteria. |
|
Correctness:
Is all of the information included correct? |
All information presented in the product is correct and accurate. |
Some of the information is incorrect. |
Most of the information is incorrect. |
|
Communication:
Is the information in the product well communicated? |
All information is neat and easy to read. Product is in an appropriate format and shows significant effort. |
Most of the product is neat and easy to read. Product is in appropriate format and shows significant effort. |
The product is not neat and easy to read or the product is not in the appropriate format. It does not show significant effort. |
|
|
|
|
Total: |
|
Comments:
You Be the Person Presentation Rubric
Criteria |
Excellent |
Good |
Fair |
Poor |
Total |
Content – Completeness The presentation included everything it should. |
Presentation included all of the important information about the topic being presented. |
Presentation covered most of the important information, but one key idea was missing. |
Presentation covered some of the important information, more than one key idea was missing. |
Presentation included some information, but it was trivial or irrelevant. |
|
Content – Correctness All of the information presented was accurate. |
All of the information presented was accurate. |
All of the information was correct with a few unintentional errors that were quickly corrected. |
Most of the information presented was correct, but there were a few errors. |
A majority of the information presented was not correct. |
|
Content – Consistency Speaker stayed on topic during the presentation. |
Presented stayed on topic 100% of the time. |
Presented stayed on topic 90 – 99% of the time. |
Presenter stayed on topic 80 – 89% of the time. |
It was hard to tell what the topic was. |
|
Prop Speaker had at least one prop that was directly related to the presentation. |
Presenter had the prop and it complimented the presentation. |
Presenter had a prop, but it was not the best choice. |
Presenter had a prop, but there was no clear reason for its choice. |
No Prop |
|
Flow Speaker knew the presentation well, so the words were well spoken and flowed well together. |
Presentation flowed well. Speaker did not stumble over words. |
Some flow problems, but they did not distract from information. |
Some flow problems interrupted presentation; presenter seemed flustered. |
Constant flow problems; information was not presented in a way it could be understood. |
|
|
|
|
|
Total: |
|